Which is Better – The Apple M1 Geekbench Or the Single-Core MacBook Air?

apple m1 geekbench

Which is Better – The Apple M1 Geekbench Or the Single-Core MacBook Air?

Apple is claiming that the upcoming MacBook Air is up to two times faster than the average laptop sold last year. In addition, the MacBook Air has double the memory of its predecessors, enabling it to easily compete with the leading gaming systems on the market today. However, that all sounds great, but what exactly is the MacBook Air’s special sauce? Why is it so much faster and can it truly deliver on Apple’s extravagant claims? We’ve been provided with our own take on this exciting new addition to the tech world, so let’s get started.

Unlike many of its predecessors, the MacBook Air uses an Intel processor instead of an AMD APU. Apple says this new approach yields significant increases in both overall performance and battery life. The iCPU inside the MacBook Air is also significantly faster, yielding upto eight cores and two terabytes of memory capacity. Apple is promising that if future updates are made to the MacBook Air, performance will remain constant or improve.

Our first set of benchmarks performed on an early generation MacBook Air, upgrading from an older model with an Intel CPU, yielded fantastic results. The Geekbench database contains two test results for the MacBook Air, one with a single core and one dual core processor running at the same time. It’s no surprise that both these options come out as the most popular options, with nearly 25 percent more queries handled by the MacBook Air when running both at the same time. This performance level is quite remarkable considering that the MacBook Air was designed to only support basic programs and functions.

The second set of benchmarks conducted on the MacBook Air highlight exactly how much of a difference getting a quad-core processor can make. As expected, the MacBook Air easily crushes the competition when running multiple applications at the same time. The two single-core test results listed above come from single-core workloads, so a multi-core score would be completely pointless for this device. But that was then, and this is now!

When looking at the two single-core tests, one immediately notices a drastic improvement when comparing to the MacBook Air. An obvious benefit is that there are significantly more applications running on the Mac when utilizing the multi-core score. Of course, this does depend on how individual Mac customers use their machines, but it’s clear that the MacBook Air doesn’t have anywhere near the storage space of the Air. Applications like Photoshop, Time lapse and Flash all utilize quite a bit of system resources. Running these applications simultaneously on a lower processor speed can really put a major damper on the overall performance.

So, we now know that multi-core scorecards can greatly improve the user experience, but which ones are the best? There are actually several different types of benchmarks that can be utilized to compare Mac hardware. All test types offer apples to apples comparison, meaning that each device will provide a true apples-to-apples comparison. The common benchmark type is the simple arithmetic scorecard. This test lets the user know the speed with which they can complete a basic mathematical task, such as adding, subtracting and multiplying.

One should also keep in mind that multi-core processors can typically run at higher speeds than single-core processors. So, multi-core MacBook Air reviews might list multi-core results first and single-core results last. While this isn’t always the case, it is worth keeping in mind when doing your own research. The result that works best for you will probably be the one that has been reviewed most often and is therefore considered the most relevant.

Another type of multi-core scorecard tool is the real-time performance test. This type of tool analyzes the speed at which tasks are completed and determines the exact duration that takes to complete them. The main benefit of using this tool is that it is very accurate and easy to use. As with the arithmetic test, it can be very helpful to read reviews of real-time performance testing tools. This can help you determine which tools provide the best apples-to-apples comparison for your needs.

Related Posts